
It's an example of how mental health professionals can't agree on shrink-think. There are two of them quoted who can't agree on whether Sutcliffe can be rehabilitated.
Looks like a space-filler story as it doesn't mean anything. I don't expect either of the 'experts' have met Sutcliffe so I reckon they haven't got a clue what they're talking about. Aload of hot air that gets bandied around as authoritative.
I think it's a case of serial wafflers...
No comments:
Post a Comment